Re: TeX live for Debian release plan
Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> On Mon, 08 Mai 2006, Ralf Stubner wrote:
>> > > . (Bug #366035) fpl fonts misplacement
>> > > difficult to fix easily (different source packages!)
>> >
>> > Yes, I think this should be fixed upstream. I'll create a list of files
>> > in teTeX that should be in tetex-base because they are required by
>> > LaTeX. When I've finished, I'll hand you over the list, or check
>> > texlive myself, and then we can discuss this on the upstream mailing
>> > list.
>>
>> This is indeed a bug in TeX Live's splitting. And moving the FPL fonts
>> would not help much if the mathpazo package is not moved, too. Wearing
>> my (second level) upstream hat: mathpazo is the only supported interface
>> for using the FPL fonts but is currently in texlive-math-extra.
>
> So what do we do here:
>
> I have moved fpl to texlive-latex-base. Should I move mathpazo, too?
IMO, yes.
> BTW: Please any non-free stuff and stuff that should be excluded from
> the .orig.tar.gz which you know of please report to me... thanks
Did you follow the discussion on the texlive list about the ibm courier
fonts? They are somewhere in texlive, misnamed, and non-free.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Reply to: