Bug#348636: Bug#300130: This is now fixed in listings Version 1.3c
On 10.05.06 Brooks Moses (bmoses@stanford.edu) wrote:
> At 10:16 AM 5/10/2006, you wrote:
Hi,
> >> This patch was incorporated in the version 1.3c update, which
> >> has been posted to CTAN earlier today and should makes its way
> >> around the various CTAN mirrors in the next couple of days or
> >> so.
> >>
> >Noticed that. Tagging the bugs as fixed upstream in our BTS. Please
> >drop us a note if there is an update for the last bug too.
>
> The CJK one, you mean?
>
Yes I do.
> At first glance, I don't know that I hold out much hope for that
> one; my impression is that CJK does weird things to get around the
> TeX 256-character limit, and listings does its own processing that
> doesn't deal at all well with that sort of weird thing. I could
> improve the part of the documentation that covers the
> incompatibility, I suppose.
>
Sorry! I should have read the bug before bothering you. In there bug
is already a note that this is a known limitation and a suggested
workaround. However we did not get a response from the submitter if
the workaround helps.
About the documentation: I just grepped through the sources of the
cjk package and did not find the string "cjk": I found a paragraph
containineg the word chinese "The extended characters don't cover
Arabic, Chinese, Hebrew, Japanese, and so on. Read section 7 for
details on work-arounds." Maybe it should be said more clearly that
CJK and listings are incompatible.
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigfault
Reply to: