Bug#358330: [tex-k] Re: Bug#358330: [tex-live] KPSE_DOT in fmtutil: Why set to `pwd`?

To: Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>
Cc: jdg@polya.uklinux.net, tex-live@tug.org, 358330@bugs.debian.org, 358330-submitter@bugs.debian.org, tex-k@tug.org
Subject: Bug#358330: [tex-k] Re: Bug#358330: [tex-live] KPSE_DOT in fmtutil: Why set to `pwd`?
From: Thomas Esser <te@dbs.uni-hannover.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:39:47 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060328053947.GA6078@dbs.uni-hannover.de>
Reply-to: Thomas Esser <te@dbs.uni-hannover.de>, 358330@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200603272152.k2RLqkd06737@f7.net>
References: <[🔎] 20060327210417.GA10671@dbs.uni-hannover.de> <[🔎] 200603272152.k2RLqkd06737@f7.net>

> I can put it back.

Yes, that would be good, thanks.

> I guess TETEXDIR is always specified as an absolute path?

Yes.

Thomas

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#358330: [tex-k] Re: Bug#358330: [tex-live] KPSE_DOT in fmtutil: Why set to `pwd`?
  - From: Thomas Esser <te@dbs.uni-hannover.de>
- Bug#358330: [tex-k] Re: Bug#358330: [tex-live] KPSE_DOT in fmtutil: Why set to `pwd`?
  - From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry)

Prev by Date: Bug#358330: [tex-k] Re: Bug#358330: [tex-live] KPSE_DOT in fmtutil: Why set to `pwd`?
Next by Date: Bug#358330: [tex-k] Re: Bug#358330: [tex-live] KPSE_DOT in fmtutil: Why set to `pwd`?
Previous by thread: Bug#358330: [tex-k] Re: Bug#358330: [tex-live] KPSE_DOT in fmtutil: Why set to `pwd`?
Next by thread: Bug#358330: [tex-k] Re: Bug#358330: [tex-live] KPSE_DOT in fmtutil: Why set to `pwd`?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread