Re: Bug#338587: tex-common fails to install
reassign 338587 debconf
thanks
Hi Debconf people, here's a grave bug filed against tex-common which
must in fact be debconf's fault:
Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
> On Fre, 11 Nov 2005, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
>> > Setting up tex-common (0.10) ...
>> > debconf: Unable to load Debconf::Element::Dialog.
>> >
>
>> Isn't that a message from debconf?
>
> Strange. Which version of debconf do you have?
Eric has debconf-2.0 installed (version 1.4.59).
$ findpkg Dialog.pm | grep debconf
usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Dialog.pm admin/debconf
usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Dialog.pm admin/debconf
usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Dialog.pm admin/debconf
these are the three distributions (stable, testing, unstable).
> My version contains:
> debconf: /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog
> debconf: /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Select.pm
> debconf: /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Password.pm
> debconf: /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Multiselect.pm
> debconf: /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Note.pm
> debconf: /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Progress.pm
> debconf: /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Boolean.pm
> debconf: /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/String.pm
> debconf: /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Text.pm
>
> I would say your debconf is broken.
Don't you have Dialog.pm installed? I have (sid chroot):
$ dpkg -L debconf | grep Dialog
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Dialog.pm
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/String.pm
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Text.pm
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Note.pm
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Multiselect.pm
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Boolean.pm
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Select.pm
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Password.pm
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Element/Dialog/Progress.pm
I'm a bit confused about the versions we have - there's debconf,
debconf-2.0 (but that seems to be a virtual package), and cdebconf
(which is clearly not the issue here).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: