Bug#265590: tetex-base should suggest tetex-doc, not recommend
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 16-08-2004 16:20, Frank Küster wrote:
| severity 265590 wishlist
| merge 265590 51869
| stop
|
| Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> wrote:
|
|
|>I understand now that I was wrong in my comparison with other -doc
packages.
|>
|>Too bad, though: I never use tetex directly. It is pulled in by GUI
|>packages using tetex scripts as backends (I assume). I imagine lots of
|>people use tetex that way, so it would be nice to not be forced to have
|>the documentation installed (nicely integrated with the tools or not).
|>Suggestion: Add a meta package simply called tetex, which depends on
|>tetex tools and doxcumentaion.
|
|
| One more good idea for the big "now we're gonna make it really right"
| package splitting party, thank you. Don't bother that the severity is
| only wishlist - it is high on our list, because the current scheme
| causes many problems, and bugs to be reported. May each of them be
| wishlist only, the whole issue is important to us.
Sounds promising :-)
Happy hacking!
~ - Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
~ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBIMV8n7DbMsAkQLgRArNRAJ92tRJon/qtjSa80Nivpr1p3jdNiwCgiyBn
ho5imxEmK1U3eRfVMWL/p1w=
=uK9Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: