[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#147628: marked as done (tetex-src: graphics should be able to include combined postscript/LaTeX files)



Your message dated Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:16:21 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.44.0406171313510.24714-100000@moby>
and subject line Closing bug 147628
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2002 07:48:23 +0000
>From Arnaud.Legrand@ens-lyon.fr Tue May 21 02:48:23 2002
Return-path: <Arnaud.Legrand@ens-lyon.fr>
Received: from (moby) [140.77.13.82] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17A4Nb-0005wo-00; Tue, 21 May 2002 02:48:23 -0500
Received: from alegrand by moby with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17A4IW-0000lF-00; Tue, 21 May 2002 09:43:08 +0200
From: Arnaud Legrand <alegrand@moby>
Subject: tetex-src: graphics should be able to include combined postscript/LaTeX files
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <E17A4IW-0000lF-00@moby>
Sender: Arnaud Legrand <Arnaud.Legrand@ens-lyon.fr>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 09:43:08 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: tetex-src
Version: 1.0.2+20011202-1
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

  I'm using intensively the combined postscript/LaTeX format of xfig and I
like the options (scale, rotate, width,...) of graphics. Being able to write
\includegraphics[width=3cm]{graph.pstex_t} is really much more convenient
than having to write \resizebox{3cm}{!}{\input{graph.pstex_t}}.
At first, I had written a crappy and rather long package using keyval to
define a command \includepstex close to \includegraphics but the following
"patch" seems to be much more efficient.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\RequirePackage{color} % Required by most pstex_t files
\def\Ginclude@rawtex#1{%
 \message{<#1>}%
 \bgroup%
 \scalebox{\Gin@scalex}{\input{#1}}%
 \egroup}
\DeclareGraphicsRule{.pstex}{eps}{*}{}
\DeclareGraphicsRule{.pstex_t}{rawtex}{.pstex}{}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Could you include this patch (or something that enable the inclusion of
.pstex_t files) in the graphics package (in the dvips driver by example) ?

Thanks in advance.

       Arnaud Legrand

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux moby 2.4.18-accelerated #1 mer mar 20 11:58:35 CET 2002 i686 unknown


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 147628-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2004 11:18:16 +0000
>From Arnaud.Legrand@ens-lyon.fr Thu Jun 17 04:18:16 2004
Return-path: <Arnaud.Legrand@ens-lyon.fr>
Received: from wifi187.wlan.ens-lyon.fr (moby) [140.77.26.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BauuN-0006NH-00; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 04:18:16 -0700
Received: from moby
	([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost ident=alegrand)
	by moby with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BausX-0006Sd-00
	for <147628-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:16:21 +0200
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:16:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Arnaud Legrand <Arnaud.Legrand@ens-lyon.fr>
X-X-Sender: alegrand@moby
To: 147628-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closing bug 147628
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0406171313510.24714-100000@moby>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 147628-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 168613




Reply to: