Bug#77530: marked as done (use bluesky fonts by default)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2004 00:34:33 +0200
with message-id <347124328.1082766873@[192.168.0.20]>
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2000 14:51:58 +0000
>From mmaciaszek@gmx.net Mon Nov 20 08:51:57 2000
Return-path: <mmaciaszek@gmx.net>
Received: from f-198-156.cvx.ipdial.viaginterkom.de (nexus.shadowrun.not) [62.180.198.156]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13xsIU-0002Q1-00; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:51:55 -0600
Received: (from fastjack@localhost)
by nexus.shadowrun.not (8.11.1/8.11.1/Debian 8.11.0-6) id eAKEptd02795;
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:51:55 +0100
Message-Id: <200011201451.eAKEptd02795@nexus.shadowrun.not>
From: Martin Maciaszek <mmaciaszek@gmx.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: use bluesky fonts by default
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.3
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.3
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:51:55 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0.2+20000804-2
Severity: wishlist
Tetex should use the bluesky fonts when tetex-extra is installed. Xdvi displays dvis using type1 fonts without problems and it makes the postscript files smaller and easier to process. Especially postscript printers are happier with type1 outlines.
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux nexus 2.4.0-test10 #1 Thu Nov 9 13:31:15 CET 2000 i686
Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii dpkg-perl 0.1-4 Perl interface modules for dpkg
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804-2 basic teTeX library files
ii tetex-bin 1.0.7+20000807-5 teTeX binary files
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 77530-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2004 22:34:36 +0000
>From mmaciaszek@gmx.net Fri Apr 23 15:34:36 2004
Return-path: <mmaciaszek@gmx.net>
Received: from mail.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BH9Eh-0005R8-00; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 15:33:31 -0700
Received: (qmail 30907 invoked by uid 65534); 23 Apr 2004 22:32:57 -0000
Received: from pD9FFCF6D.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO docwagon.shadowrun.not) (217.255.207.109)
by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 24 Apr 2004 00:32:57 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1871416
Received: from localhost (shibanokuji.shadowrun.not [192.168.0.20])
by docwagon.shadowrun.not (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3NMYPh64294
for <77530-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 00:34:26 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from mmaciaszek@gmx.net)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 00:34:33 +0200
From: Martin Maciaszek <mmaciaszek@gmx.net>
To: 77530-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject:
Message-ID: <347124328.1082766873@[192.168.0.20]>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: 77530-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4950
Reply to: