Bug#227856: marked as done (tetex-bin: dvipdfm generates bitmap fonts in stead of T1 fonts)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:42:54 +0100
with message-id <400BD0CE.8000003@oce.nl>
and subject line Problem solved.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2004 09:56:14 +0000
>From bilm@oce.nl Thu Jan 15 03:56:14 2004
Return-path: <bilm@oce.nl>
Received: from smtp01.oce.nl [134.188.1.25]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ah4EX-00034h-00; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 03:56:14 -0600
Received: from smtp05.oce.nl (smtp05.oce.nl [134.188.1.26])
by smtp01.oce.nl (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0F9u0PN014484;
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:56:00 +0100 (MET)
Received: from smtp-venlo.oce.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp05.oce.nl (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0F9txfQ008300;
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:55:59 +0100 (MET)
Received: from smtp03.oce.nl (smtp03.oce.nl [134.188.150.26])
by smtp-venlo.oce.nl (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0F9tvaa016945;
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:55:57 +0100 (MET)
Received: from pc1-bilm.oce.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp03.oce.nl (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with SMTP id i0F9trWw002753;
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:55:57 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200401150955.i0F9trWw002753@smtp03.oce.nl>
Received: by pc1-bilm.oce.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:56:05 +0100
From: "Manuel Bilderbeek" <bilm@oce.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin: dvipdfm generates bitmap fonts in stead of T1 fonts
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:56:05 +0100
X-Filter-Version: 1.12a-oce (smtp-venlo)
X-Spam-Scanner: E-mail has been checked
X-Spam-Scanner-Check: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-3.9,
required 5, BAYES_10 -4.70, MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_2 0.79)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,
MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-5.1
Severity: normal
Here at work we have a LaTeX class that uses PostScript fonts, instead
of the normal CM fonts. The kind of fonts we use can be reproduced with
this minimal (OK, probably not very minimal) TeX file (many parts taken
from our .cls and .sty, to try to get the same font conditions):
------------------------------------------
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\DeclareFontFamily{OMS}{oce}{\skewchar\font127}
\DeclareFontShape{OMS}{oce}{m}{n}
{<-> phvr}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OMS}{oce}{m}{it}
{<-> ssub * cmm/m/it}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OMS}{oce}{m}{sl}
{<-> ssub * cmm/m/it}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OMS}{oce}{m}{sc}
{<-> ssub * cmm/m/it}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OMS}{oce}{b}{n}
{<-> ssub * cmm/b/it}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OMS}{oce}{b}{it}
{<-> ssub * cmm/b/it}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OMS}{oce}{b}{sl}
{<-> ssub * cmm/b/it}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OMS}{oce}{b}{sc}
{<-> ssub * cmm/b/it}{}
\DeclareFontFamily{OML}{oce}{\skewchar\font127}
\DeclareFontShape{OML}{oce}{m}{n}
{<-> psyr}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OML}{oce}{m}{it}
{<-> phvro7t}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OML}{oce}{m}{sl}
{<-> ssub * cmm/m/it}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OML}{oce}{m}{sc}
{<-> ssub * cmm/m/it}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OML}{oce}{b}{n}
{<-> ssub * cmm/b/it}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OML}{oce}{b}{it}
{<-> ssub * cmm/b/it}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OML}{oce}{b}{sl}
{<-> ssub * cmm/b/it}{}
\DeclareFontShape{OML}{oce}{b}{sc}
{<-> ssub * cmm/b/it}{}
\DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathsym}{OML}{oce}{m}{n}
\SetMathAlphabet\mathnormal{normal}{OML}{oce}{m}{it}
\SetMathAlphabet\mathcal{normal}{OMS}{oce}{m}{n}
\SetMathAlphabet\mathrm{normal}{OT1}{phv}{m}{n}
\SetMathAlphabet\mathbf{normal}{OT1}{phv}{bx}{n}
\SetMathAlphabet\mathsf{normal}{OT1}{phv}{m}{sl}
\SetMathAlphabet\mathit{normal}{OT1}{phv}{m}{it}
\SetMathAlphabet\mathtt{normal}{OT1}{pcr}{m}{n}
\skewchar\textfont1='24
\skewchar\textfont2='242
\def\dot{\mathaccent"70C7}
\DeclareSymbolFont{extras}{OML}{oce}{m}{n}
\DeclareSymbolFont{cmitalics}{OML}{cmm}{m}{it}
\SetSymbolFont{letters}{normal}{OML}{oce}{m}{it}
%\SetSymbolFont{operators}{normal}{OMS}{oce}{m}{n}
\SetSymbolFont{symbols}{normal}{OMS}{cmsy}{m}{n}
\SetSymbolFont{largesymbols}{normal}{OMX}{cmex}{m}{n}
\SetSymbolFont{extras}{normal}{OML}{oce}{m}{n}
\SetSymbolFont{cmitalics}{normal}{OML}{cmm}{m}{it}
\renewcommand{\familydefault}{phv}
\renewcommand{\ttfamily}{\fontfamily{pcr}\selectfont}
\begin{document}
I work at Oc\'e{}.
\end{document}
----------------------------------------
When I generate PDF via:
latex test.tex
dvips -P pdf test.dvi
ps2pdf test.ps
and then view it with Acrobat Reader (e.g.), the fonts look fine.
But when I generate PDF via:
latex test.tex
dvipdfm test.dvi
and then view it with Acrobat Reader (e.g.), the fonts look horrible,
clearly bitmapped. I know for sure that it worked fine a couple of
months ago (when I last wrote a report :-).
This is the verbosed output of dvipdfm:
$ dvipdfm -vvv test.dvi
Warning: Couldn't open font map file cmr.map
Warning: Couldn't open font map file psbase14.map
Warning: Couldn't open font map file lw35urw.map
test.dvi -> test.pdf
DVI File Info
Unit: 25400000 / 473628672
Mag: 1000
Media Height: 41451520
Media Width: 28114944
Stack Depth: 4
Page count: 1
DVI Comment: TeX output 2004.01.15:1035
DVI file font info
name: phvr7t, TeX/DVI ID: 15, size: 11.96 pt,
[1<phvr7t@11.96pt(TFM:/usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/adobe/helvetic/phvr7t.tfm)(VF:/usr/share/texmf/fonts/vf/adobe/helvetic/phvr7t.vf(TFM:/usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/adobe/helvetic/phvr8r.tfm)<phvr8r@11.96pt
fontmap: phvr8r (no map)
>)(VF)>](/var/cache/fonts/pk/modeless/adobe/helvetic/phvr8r.720pk)
Compression eliminated approximately 2398 bytes
8114 bytes written
It's clear that it uses the .720pk generated bitmap-font (with MF).
Also, I wonder why the .map files that are in the default config of
dvipdfm do no exist on my system...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pc1-bilm 2.4.21-3-686 #1 Sun Jul 20 16:11:09 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii debconf 1.3.22 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.6.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dpkg 1.10.18 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii ed 0.2-20 The classic unix line editor
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.2-4 GCC support library
ii libkpathsea3 2.0.2-5.1 path search library for teTeX (run
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4 PNG library - runtime
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.2-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libwww0 5.4.0-9 The W3C WWW library
ii libxaw7 4.2.1-12.1 X Athena widget set library
ii mime-support 3.23-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii perl 5.8.2-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii t1lib1 1.3.1-3 Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii tetex-base 2.0.2-5.1 Basic library files of teTeX
ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-3 compression library - runtime
-- debconf information:
* tetex-bin/upd_map: true
* tetex-bin/cnf_name:
* tetex-bin/fmtutil: true
tetex-bin/userperm: false
* tetex-bin/texmf: true
* tetex-bin/hyphen: british, dutch, french[=patois], ngerman[=naustrian-neue_Rechtschreibung]
tetex-bin/oldcfg: true
* tetex-bin/use_debconf: true
* tetex-bin/groupname: users
tetex-bin/groupperm: true
* tetex-bin/lsr-perms: true
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 227856-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2004 13:43:22 +0000
>From bilm@oce.nl Mon Jan 19 05:43:22 2004
Return-path: <bilm@oce.nl>
Received: from smtp01.oce.nl [134.188.1.25]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AiZgY-0001FJ-00; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 05:43:22 -0800
Received: from smtp05.oce.nl (smtp05.oce.nl [134.188.1.26])
by smtp01.oce.nl (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0JDgbPV011195
for <227856-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:42:39 +0100 (MET)
Received: from smtp-venlo.oce.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp05.oce.nl (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0JCgsfQ024586
for <227856-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:42:54 +0100 (MET)
Received: from smtp03.oce.nl (smtp03.oce.nl [134.188.150.26])
by smtp-venlo.oce.nl (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0JCgqaa005945
for <227856-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:42:52 +0100 (MET)
Received: from oce.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp03.oce.nl (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0JCgoWw000433
for <227856-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:42:52 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <400BD0CE.8000003@oce.nl>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:42:54 +0100
From: Manuel Bilderbeek <bilm@oce.nl>
Organization: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Oc=E9-Technologies_B=2EV=2E?=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031107 Debian/1.5-3
X-Accept-Language: nl, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 227856-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Problem solved.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Filter-Version: 1.12a-oce (smtp-venlo)
X-Spam-Scanner: E-mail has been checked
X-Spam-Scanner-Check: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-5.4,
required 5, BAYES_01 -5.40, USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA 0.00)
Delivered-To: 227856-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level:
See previous mail.
--
----------- Manuel Bilderbeek -----------
Oce-Technologies B.V. tel +31 77 3595039
St Urbanusweg 43 fax +31 77 3595337
NL-5900 MA Venlo home +31 24 3238923
The Netherlands e-mail bilm@oce.nl
-----------------------------------------
Reply to: