Bug#264241: Some corrections regardings statements in this bug

[Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>]

tags 264241 + patch
stop

On 14.08.04 Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de) wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 12:25:49PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:

Hi Adrian,

> > > + command mktexlsr
> > > + mktexlsr
> > > mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R... 
> > > mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R... 
> > > mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN... 
> > > mktexlsr: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R... 
> > > mktexlsr: Done.
> > > + '[' xpurge = xremove ']'
> > > 
> > And this is the point, where he starts purging, right?
> >...
> 
> no.
> 
> I'm an idiot.
> 
> Ryan is right.
> 
> Purging starts after the "Purging configuration files for tetex-extra".
> 
> The mktexlsr call is outside of the check whether it's the removal 
> phase (I've first looked at 2.0.2-9, where it's inside the check).
> 
Yes. We took it out, to make sure it is called during upgrade too.
Might it be a better idea to check if we're upgrading or removing
before we remove the formats and call mktexlsr, instead of checking
if mktexlsr exists.
Patch attached. Frank, is that a good idea?

H. 
-- 
sigmentation fault

--- tetex-extra.postrm.orig	2004-08-14 11:22:03.000000000 +0000
+++ tetex-extra.postrm	2004-08-14 11:45:13.000000000 +0000
@@ -24,15 +24,14 @@
 
 # we remove tetex-extra's formats always, also on upgrade: If there was an error in 
 # tetex-extra that caused a corrupted format to be build, it has to be redone.
-for file in amstex.fmt omega.oft lambda.oft mpost.mem \
+if [ x"$1" = "xremove" -o x"$1" = "xupgrade" ]; then
+  for file in amstex.fmt omega.oft lambda.oft mpost.mem \
              metafun.mem omega.fmt lambda.fmt; do
- rm -f /var/lib/texmf/web2c/$file
-done
-
-command mktexlsr >/dev/null 2>&1 && mktexlsr
+  rm -f /var/lib/texmf/web2c/$file
+  done
+  command mktexlsr >/dev/null 2>&1 && mktexlsr
+fi
 
 if [ x"$1" = "xremove" ]; then
     ucf_purge
 fi
-
-