Re: questions regarding patch-tmp

[Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>]

Hi,

frank@kuesterei.ch (Frank Küster) wrote:

> This is what we want:
>
>               ps->ysize = vsiz ;
> +             *(ps->specdat = nextstring++) = '\0' ;
>               canaddtopaper = 1 ;
>
> And this is what upstream has now:
>
>             ps->ysize = vsiz ;
> +           ps->specdat = nextstring++ ;
> +           *(ps->specdat) = 0 ;
>             canaddtopaper = 1 ;
>
> It's o.k. to just keep it like that, right?

I think so.

> * texmf.in: Why do we allow searches for files on disk instead of
>   restricting searches to ls-R, as in upstream? This would speed up
>   searching, and properly installed packages should regenerate ls-R
>   anyway.

The Debian packages do that? Ugh...

-- 
Florent