Bug#189343: tetex-doc: poor Description:
From: <stefan.ulrich@zen.co.uk>
Subject: Bug#189343: tetex-doc: poor Description:
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:56:39 GMT
> > It is. There are some wishlist bugs about splitting xdvi off from
> > tetex-bin as it seems to be one of the few programs in tetex-bin,
> > which depends on xlibs. The other program is that /usr/bin/mfw
> > (Metafont with support for displaying generated characters).
>
> Yes, I've seen that bug - I think I have no opinion on it. (It makes
> sense from a logical point of view, but it might take some effort to
> untangle the dependencies. Currently xt.ac is in kpathsea, which
> doesn't seem right, and might change in the future.)
Well, I agreed that splitting of tetex-bin might be
some effort. At least, I have no time to try it yet.
Anyway if you got any consensus on new Descriptions,
I'm very happy to see full Descriptions once again.
Thanks, 2003-8-18(Mon)
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: