Bug#185441: tetex-extra: Overwriting file from tetex-base

[Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>]

From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Subject: Bug#185441: tetex-extra: Overwriting file from tetex-base
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:56:18 +0200

> > So there is no duplication, I will close this later.
> > 
> I'm not completely sure. He's not the only one with that problem, so
> i guess this is not a fake. Did that file move at any time from base
> to extra? The submitter didn't show the installed version of
> tetex-base.

As far as I remembered, pdftex/pdflatex stuffs were in 
tetex-extra.  So we had gotten bugs which had complained
that pdftex/pdflatex hadn't run without tetex-extra for a
long time.

So, on the contrary, I moved them from tetex-extra to
tetex-base recently:

tetex-base (1.0.2+20021025-4) unstable; urgency=low
...
  * Moved pdftex/pdflatex stuffs in tetex-base so now pdftex/pdflatex
    should work without tetex-extra.  [kohda]  
    (Closes: #143751, #95995, #139298)

Further, the latest tetex-base and tetex-extra set;

Replaces: texidoc, ... , tetex-extra (<< 2.0-2),

Replaces: kpathsea, ... , tetex-base (<< 2.0-2),

respectively, so I believe there is not a overwriting
problem at present.

# It is true, though, that between 1.0.2+20021025 and 2.0 
# there was overwriting problems.

Thanks,				2003-4-10(Thu)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.