Bug#170337: marked as done (debconf description is not self-explaining)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Apr 2003 12:22:14 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <20030408.122214.112608301.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
and subject line not so bad, perhaps
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Nov 2002 23:36:48 +0000
>From inet@zombie.inka.de Fri Nov 22 17:36:47 2002
Return-path: <inet@zombie.inka.de>
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (uni-kl.de) [131.246.137.52]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18FNLq-0002jr-00; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:36:46 -0600
Received: from mailgate1.uni-kl.de (mailgate1.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.5])
by uni-kl.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id gAMNaj5t005066;
Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:36:45 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de (mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.54])
by mailgate1.uni-kl.de (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAMNaiS7011191;
Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:36:45 +0100
Received: from domino.informatik.uni-kl.de (root@domino.informatik.uni-kl.de [131.246.161.19])
by mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id gAMNahOM000292;
Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:36:43 +0100 (MET)
Received: from zombie (rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de [131.246.178.65])
by domino.informatik.uni-kl.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAMNahq02920;
Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:36:44 +0100 (MET)
Received: from inet by zombie with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18FNLs-00087i-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:36:48 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eduard Bloch <blade@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: debconf description is not self-explaining
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:36:48 +0100
Message-Id: <E18FNLs-00087i-00@zombie>
Sender: Eduard Bloch <inet@zombie.inka.de>
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: current
Severity: minor
Tags: sid
The description of the new query is not understandable for the
outsiders. What is an "ls-lR-file", and Why I should limit access to them?
Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zombie 2.4.20-rc2 #11 Mit Nov 20 12:00:33 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro
Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii debianutils 1.22.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dpkg 1.10.9 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii ed 0.2-19 The classic unix line editor
hi libc6 2.3.1-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libkpathsea3 1.0.7+20011202-8 shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii libpng3 1.2.5-6 PNG library - runtime
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-15 The GNU stdc++ library
ii libtiff3g 3.5.7-1 Tag Image File Format library
ii libxaw7 4.2.1-3 X Athena widget set library
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20011202-3 basic teTeX library files
ii xlibs 4.2.1-3 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-6 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 170337-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2003 03:22:19 +0000
>From kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp Mon Apr 07 22:22:19 2003
Return-path: <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Received: from civic.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp [150.59.48.140] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 192jgg-0003a0-00; Mon, 07 Apr 2003 22:22:19 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=kohda)
by civic.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 192jgf-0004aw-00
for <170337-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 12:22:17 +0900
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 12:22:14 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20030408.122214.112608301.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
To: 170337-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: not so bad, perhaps
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 170337-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=4.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
As far as I can tell, it was overlooked the message or
something so I closed the bug.
If there is any improvement, we will welcome.
Thanks, 2003.4.8(Tue)
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: