[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#180297: marked as done (tetex-base: should replace tetex-extra (<< 2.0))



Your message dated Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:47:37 -0500
with message-id <E18kdBp-0004RH-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#180297: fixed in tetex-base 2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Feb 2003 22:53:29 +0000
>From amu@ucko.debian.net Sat Feb 08 16:53:28 2003
Return-path: <amu@ucko.debian.net>
Received: from 216-15-37-107.c3-0.161-ubr3.lnh-161.md.cable.rcn.com (ucko.debian.net) [216.15.37.107] (foobar)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18hdqh-0002Wn-00; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 16:53:27 -0600
Received: from amu by ucko.debian.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18hdqf-0002Bn-00; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 17:53:25 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-base: should replace tetex-extra (<< 2.0)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 17:53:25 -0500
Message-Id: <[🔎] E18hdqf-0002Bn-00@ucko.debian.net>
Sender: "Aaron M. Ucko" <amu@ucko.debian.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid

Attempting to upgrade tetex-base with tetex-extra 1.0.2+20021025-7
installed yields

> Preparing to replace tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-7 (using .../tetex-base_2.0-1_all.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement tetex-base ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_2.0-1_all.deb (--unpack):
>  trying to overwrite `/etc/texmf/dvips/bsr-interpolated.map', which is also in package tetex-extra
> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)

This does not occur with tetex-extra upgraded to 2.0-1, so a versioned
Replaces: should suffice.

Likewise, tetex-doc should replace tetex-base (<< 2.0-1):

> Preparing to replace tetex-doc 1.0.2+20021025-7 (using .../tetex-doc_2.0-1_all.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement tetex-doc ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-doc_2.0-1_all.deb (--unpack):
>  trying to overwrite `/usr/share/doc/texmf/amstex/README.gz', which is also in package tetex-base
> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)

occurs with tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-7 but not with 2.0-1.
(I can file that as a separate report if you like.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tux 2.4.20 #1 Wed Dec 25 15:38:48 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.2.23     Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                          1.10.9     Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  texinfo                       4.3-1      Documentation system for on-line i

-- debconf information excluded


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 180297-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Feb 2003 04:50:52 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Sun Feb 16 22:50:51 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18kdEx-0005kS-00; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:50:51 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 18kdBp-0004RH-00; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:47:37 -0500
From: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
To: 180297-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.32 $
Subject: Bug#180297: fixed in tetex-base 2.0-2
Message-Id: <E18kdBp-0004RH-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:47:37 -0500
Delivered-To: 180297-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tetex-base_2.0-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0-2.diff.gz
tetex-base_2.0-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0-2.dsc
tetex-base_2.0-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0-2_all.deb
tetex-doc_2.0-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_2.0-2_all.deb
tetex-extra_2.0-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_2.0-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 180297@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 07:23:47 +0900
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
Description: 
 tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
 tetex-doc  - teTeX documentation
 tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
Closes: 180297 180360 180400 180600 180770
Changes: 
 tetex-base (2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed dependency and setup-conffiles.  [kohda]
     (Closes: #180360, #180297, #180600)
   * Fixed postrm so /etc/texdoctk should be removed at purge.  Also old
     dat files would be removed with debconf.  [kohda]  (Closes: #180400)
   * Fixed handling of generated files with updmap; now they were not conffiles
     but configuration files and only installed when they didn't exist.
     [kohda]  (Closes: #180770)
   * Fixed Description.  [kohda]
Files: 
 4cf3ac7997e20d4498d36575829b7597 786 tex optional tetex-base_2.0-2.dsc
 1942da504935e88a40d9ff0f6e7ae79d 39413 tex optional tetex-base_2.0-2.diff.gz
 6dd9d12339eeffbf50fbdbe0e987da37 13906088 tex optional tetex-base_2.0-2_all.deb
 e097bf47c2f0f895d18d869f7994d0fb 10338868 tex optional tetex-extra_2.0-2_all.deb
 5daa36dc217e3b5e25a9323ca8db824c 27216814 tex optional tetex-doc_2.0-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+UGMy1IXdL1v6kOwRAmocAJ46LZXBq9b66iWvQVxjXwrmda4IqwCfSaB2
qUgnlhr7QFIbG5S8MeCPKOQ=
=tKGp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: