Re: Update tetex-bin description re pdflatex
From: dan@tellurian.com.au
Subject: Update tetex-bin description re pdflatex
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:20:07 +1030 (CST)
> Here's a simple one.
>
> pdflatex doesn't appear in the "Includes" part of the description (dpkg
> -p) which means that apt-cache doesn't find it, and even google doesn't
> come up with any clues. After a little confusion I worked out which
> package had it by searching the bug database. This should be fixed.
Yes, description of tetex packages is completely outdated.
We recognized it and I proposed some idea once.
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Subject: Description etc. need update
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:14:16 +0900 (JST)
> Hi all,
>
> The current Description of tetx-bin contains
>
> Includes: ps2pk, dvilj, amstex, dvips, texbin, bibtex, xdvi, makeindex,
> latex, kpathsea, mfbin, amslatex
>
> It's not only me who wonder what is texbin/mfbin and why ps2pk is
> put in the first place.
>
> More strange one is of tetex-base;
>
> Includes: texlib, latex, mflib, mfbasfnt, bibtex, textfm
>
> and of tetex-extra;
>
> Includes: texlib, latex, mflib, mfbasfnt, bibtex, textfm
>
> hmmm, these are completely same and what is texlib or mfbasfnt(?),
> and of tetex-doc;
>
> Includes: latex2e-doc
>
> I guess that Description of tetex-bin might be;
>
> Includes: tex, latex, omega, lambda, bibtex, makeindex, dvips, xdvi,
> metafont, amstex, amslatex
>
> and of tetex-base;
>
> Includes: files for standard tex/latex/bibtex, for pdftex/pdflatex/context,
> for metapost (or mpost?), tfm files, mf files (or source files
> for metafont?)
>
> and there is no need of "Includes:" line for tetex-doc.
>
> Description of, at least, tetex-base should be more refined,
> I guess.
>
> Further, I wrote README.Debian for tetex-bin (it didn't
> exist at all in older version!)
>
> I hope someone would refine it, really.
We will certainly need to update description.
Thanks for your interest. 2003-1-3(Fri)
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
Reply to: