Bug#65961: marked as done (tetex-base/tetex-nonfree: serious license problems)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:25:56 +0200
with message-id <200008210925.LAA21277@bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
and subject line Fixed in Version 1.0.2+20000804-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2000 15:27:42 +0000
>From J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk Tue Jun 20 10:27:42 2000
Return-path: <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
Received: from mserv1c.u-net.net [195.102.240.33]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 134PwE-00079d-00; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:27:42 -0500
Received: from [195.102.198.243] (helo=polya)
by mserv1c.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #35)
id 134Pv3-0000Tk-00
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:26:29 +0100
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 134PuF-0000Ae-00; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:25:39 +0100
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:25:38 +0100
From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
To: Debian bug reports <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-base/tetex-nonfree: serious license problems
Message-ID: <20000620162538.C569@polya>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-base
Version: 1.0-10
Severity: important
I just noticed that at the moment, tetex-base builds tetex-nonfree.
This means that Debian source CDs will contain the source for
tetex-nonfree. This is a real problem, and should be addressed for
potato. Are there any license problems in distributing tetex-nonfree
on CD?
This should be fixed in potato; unfortunately, I don't have the
time or bandwidth in the next 24 hours to download it, fix the problem
and upload it again.
Note that seminar should no longer be in non-free; it's licensed under
the LPPL, and that most of /usr/share/doc/copyright.seminar.gz should
actually be called something like /usr/share/doc/README.seminar.gz.
I don't know if there's a newer version of stmaryrd.sty around, but
the current one says:
%% IMPORTANT NOTICE:
%%
%% For the copyright see the source file.
%%
%% You are *not* allowed to modify this file.
%%
%% You are *not* allowed to distribute this file.
%% For distribution of the original source see
%% the terms for copying and modification in the file stmaryrd.dtx.
It rather sounds like we shouldn't be distributing it at all, at
least, not until the license is changed.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 65961-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2000 09:26:39 +0000
>From martin@verwaltung.uni-mainz.de Mon Aug 21 04:26:39 2000
Return-path: <martin@verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
Received: from lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [::ffff:134.93.144.162]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13Qnqo-0008UD-00; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 04:26:38 -0500
Received: from harriet.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (root@harriet.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [134.93.226.19])
by lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id LAA29371
for <65961-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:26:37 +0200
Received: from bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (root@bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [134.93.226.18])
by harriet.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id LAA22680
for <65961-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:25:57 +0200
From: Christoph Martin <martin@verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
Received: (from martin@localhost)
by bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id LAA21277
for 65961-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:25:56 +0200
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:25:56 +0200
Message-Id: <200008210925.LAA21277@bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
To: 65961-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed in Version 1.0.2+20000804-1
Delivered-To: 65961-done@bugs.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.6
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 13:48:43 +0200
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-doc tetex-base tetex-extra tetex-nonfree
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2+20000804-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
Description:
tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
tetex-doc - teTeX documentation
tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
tetex-nonfree - non-free teTeX library files
Closes: 55001 65825 65961 67756 67781
Changes:
tetex-base (1.0.2+20000804-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* new upstream beta
* no more nonfree packages (closes: #65961)
* remove some files which are now in texinfo (closes: #65825)
* update Standards-Version to 3.2.0 and introduce Build-Depends (closes:
#67781)
* tetex-doc suggests texdoctk (closes: #67756)
* new hyphenation-patterns for dutch (nehyph) (closes: #55001)
Files:
ab8a5cdefd31b6427e466237cd031a3e 896 tex standard tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-1.dsc
8216d2fc3f1646e6a1ec445de44e2b55 35109497 tex standard tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804.orig.tar.gz
3c9e08057e64d1a824923e3c37468cfb 25233 tex standard tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-1.diff.gz
cc0020d36611cf8babd1aaadd3853fb7 13264124 tex standard tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-1_all.deb
8443d5ab5acd0fc4dbb4e1ed920322aa 9721442 tex optional tetex-extra_1.0.2+20000804-1_all.deb
49ddfad5a1edd22d55311ed367b66b7d 12374834 tex optional tetex-doc_1.0.2+20000804-1_all.deb
0f3c2b40ae6267a75e846fd05d26a213 2058 non-free/tex optional tetex-nonfree_1.0.2+20000804-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBOZ562W4/9k35XC9tAQF9pAgArmFxUKUxXay8tKMXlDA6O3xWq3ugwlCS
b164QlqeFhxJIeiWNliX3HabZg5F9ZccEKEz0z4kgtgrQdgyViXWsfw5G2qz68aE
hlp375yJY0Smaltxl6IgiozRIb+YT81B39i1VI7WSs8S8q7F+JOer/l/GYPujZCC
YXoY6jGPsxNaPq1SUUisVKJPQs+7W5Hxek5PSDq4FEy9DE2SUQ0suPxJHOq87mZr
Sicb4z5Iq2Ptjr3E8YZpPtQH3HozXEGdga5q6GdnImEuSeIAUTlwIYLs295zHpHH
HM/kCDTrOiUIgKCEqOdrn7Qe74ko7n4r4ESeu/C7Pz/h9piHWh3VWw==
=r4e5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: