[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#66025: marked as done (tetex-base: Preinst fails)



Your message dated Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:29:01 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <Pine.NEB.4.21.0007032227570.16410-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
and subject line Fixed in NMU tetex-base 1.0.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2000 16:38:54 +0000
>From lonewolf@taikatech.com Wed Jun 21 11:38:54 2000
Return-path: <lonewolf@taikatech.com>
Received: from mmcmli.hdyn.saunalahti.fi (escaflowne.jung.taikatech.fi) [195.197.45.251] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 134nWf-0001Pe-00; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:38:53 -0500
Received: from lonewolf by escaflowne.jung.taikatech.fi with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 134nWU-0007Ul-00; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 19:38:42 +0300
From: Ilpo Ruotsalainen <lonewolf@taikatech.com>
Subject: tetex-base: Preinst fails
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.3
Message-Id: <E134nWU-0007Ul-00@escaflowne.jung.taikatech.fi>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 19:38:42 +0300
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: tetex-base
Version: N/A
Severity: grave

Totally unable to install because preinst exits with error code 1.

Like this:

escaflowne:~# apt-get install tetex-bin
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  tetex-base tetex-lib 
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  tetex-base tetex-bin tetex-lib 
0 packages upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 12 not upgraded.
Need to get 14.0MB of archives. After unpacking 43.4MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
Get:1 http://sunsite.tut.fi unstable/main tetex-base 1.0.2-1 [11.3MB]
Get:2 http://sunsite.tut.fi unstable/main tetex-bin 1.0.7-1 [2647kB]           
Get:3 http://sunsite.tut.fi unstable/main tetex-lib 1.0.7-1 [33.0kB]           
Fetched 14.0MB in 1m8s (204kB/s)                                               
(Reading database ... 24883 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking tetex-base (from .../tetex-base_1.0.2-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0.2-1_all.deb (--unpack):
 subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-lib.
Unpacking tetex-lib (from .../tetex-lib_1.0.7-1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_1.0.7-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-bin_1.0.7-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0.2-1_all.deb
 /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-bin_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux escaflowne 2.2.16-RAID #1 SMP Tue Jun 20 03:04:15 EEST 2000 i686 unknown

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 66024-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2000 20:29:04 +0000
>From bunk@fs.tum.de Mon Jul 03 15:29:04 2000
Return-path: <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Received: from nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.176.79] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 139Cpz-0000qU-00; Mon, 03 Jul 2000 15:29:03 -0500
Received: (qmail 1994 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2000 20:29:02 -0000
Received: from neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.176.23)
  by nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP; 3 Jul 2000 20:29:02 -0000
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:29:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
X-Sender: bunk@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de
To: 65826-done@bugs.debian.org, 65827-done@bugs.debian.org, 
    66024-done@bugs.debian.org, 66283-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed in NMU tetex-base 1.0.2-2
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0007032227570.16410-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 66024-done@bugs.debian.org


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.6
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 03:08:08 +0200
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-doc tetex-base tetex-extra tetex-nonfree
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Description: 
 tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
 tetex-doc  - teTeX documentation
 tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
 tetex-nonfree - non-free teTeX library files
Closes: 65826 65827 66024 66283
Changes: 
 tetex-base (1.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * preinst end with "exit 0" instead of "exit 1" (closes: #66024, #66283)
   * Removed obsolete /usr/share/doc/tetex-base/copyright.seminar.gz
     and corrected description of tetex-nonfree (closes: #65826)
   * Moved koma-script from tetex-nonfree to tetex-extra (closes: #65827)
   * Added a note at debian/copyright about the licence change of seminar
     and koma-script
   * Corrected typo in the description of tetex-doc
   * Upload sponsored by Tony Mancill <tmancill@debian.org>
Files: 
 377587be6afd7499caf8ffc760ca6564 652 tex standard tetex-base_1.0.2-2.dsc
 43a2a2b2547cdbf384c6b9a2aada05aa 25228 tex standard tetex-base_1.0.2-2.diff.gz
 4ab4adafc90ed2008137ffdfd55ee870 11292542 tex standard tetex-base_1.0.2-2_all.deb
 a8a49b1b55914ebf3546542c16d623c5 9679504 tex optional tetex-extra_1.0.2-2_all.deb
 f4c1cd688d1f26c718e2a8e317bdbafa 12169622 tex optional tetex-doc_1.0.2-2_all.deb
 570fc7f8f5f51d86c1ac7a6711d072e6 70932 non-free/tex optional tetex-nonfree_1.0.2-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjlfmmgACgkQpdwBkPlyvgPH6wCeI8HjRQ20FIJWXvxC1FO+dCJJ
9wEAn2MSVubjl+L1n+JiURIRrjwEFsR8
=85r6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply to: