Bug#65961: tetex-base/tetex-nonfree: serious license problems

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote:

> Notwithstanding the comments below, this should still be clarified in
> potato, and the licenses clarified.  There mustn't be any non-free
> stuff in a free source package.

Where did you read this "There mustn't be any non-free stuff in a free
source package."?

If you really want this to be changed, you also have to change it in the
following packages: gimp, gimp1.1

>    Julian

cu,
Adrian

-- 
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
                -- Mahatma Ghandi