next plan to bug fix
Hi all,
It seemed new mechanism with update-texmf and update-fmtutil
has not caused so serious problem. Thanks for your support.
I intend to fix the following problems in the next upload:
- a bit more robust update-texmf/update-fmtutil
bug#139979 said;
Setting up tetex-bin (1.0.7+20011202-5.1) ...
/bin/ls: /etc/texmf/texmf.d/*: No such file or directory
Regenerating /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ...
It just hangs after writing this.
This revealed to be caused by a broken package but
hanging is very bad anyway. So I guess to modify
if [ -f /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF ] ; then
CNFFILES=`/bin/ls -1 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/* | egrep -v "(.dpkg-[a-z]*|~|.bak)$"`
else
echo "Something seems wrong"
exit 1
fi
might be better. (Please let me know more cool message ;-)
Or more simply
CNFFILES=`/bin/ls -1 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/* | egrep -v "(.dpkg-[a-z]*|~|.bak)$"` || exit 1
is sufficient?
(I am thinking the similar modification for update-fmtutil.)
- 95662 simple, patch was supplied, and reasonable
- 131638 simple and easy (and fairly important)
- 138161/139028 if I understand correctly these are the same problem.
very useful for whizzytex(cool tool!) but I am not so
sure how to fix this; there are two patches,
--- /tmp/xdvi.old Fri Mar 15 16:29:58 2002
+++ /usr/bin/xdvi Fri Mar 15 16:30:08 2002
@@ -71,5 +71,4 @@
filename=$tempfile
fi
-xdvi.bin $NAMEOPT $args $filename || exit 1
-exit 0
+exec xdvi.bin $NAMEOPT $args $filename
and
--- /usr/bin/xdvi.orig Tue Mar 19 10:34:32 2002
+++ /usr/bin/xdvi Tue Mar 19 10:34:50 2002
@@ -71,5 +71,5 @@
filename=$tempfile
fi
-xdvi.bin $NAMEOPT $args $filename || exit 1
+exec xdvi.bin $NAMEOPT $args $filename || exit 1
exit 0
which one is preferable?
Best regards, 2002.4.1
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-tetex-maint-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: