[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#883875: marked as done (upgrade-reports: linux-image-4.9.0-4-amd64 from stable-proposed-updates prompts upgrade to stable-backports version of linux-cpupower)



Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:53:00 +0000
with message-id <1512759180.1994.22.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#883875: upgrade-reports: linux-image-4.9.0-4-amd64 from stable-proposed-updates prompts upgrade to stable-backports version of linux-cpupower
has caused the Debian Bug report #883875,
regarding upgrade-reports: linux-image-4.9.0-4-amd64 from stable-proposed-updates prompts upgrade to stable-backports version of linux-cpupower
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
883875: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883875
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.3
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 10:05 -0800, CJanisch wrote:
> Package: upgrade-reports
> Severity: minor
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
> appropriate ***
> 
>    * What led up to the situation?
>    * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
>      ineffective)?
>    * What was the outcome of this action?
>    * What outcome did you expect instead?
> 
> *** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
> 

Closing this in favour of #883879, which contains a little more
information. Please don't file duplicate bugs, particularly ones that
still contain the template with no information filled in.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply to: