[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#309329: sarge upgrade



I forgot to attach the attachment (and to make a comment), sorry.



Package: upgrade-reports

Archive date: Sun May 15 19:00:02 UTC 2005
uname -a: Linux charas 2.4.29 #10 Sat Mar 26 15:40:33 CET 2005 i686
GNU/Linux 
Method: apt-get -f dist-upgrade

Contents of /etc/apt/sources.list:

deb http://ftp.it.debian.org/debian sarge main contrib non-free
deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ testing main

- Were there any non-Debian packages installed before the upgrade?  If
  so, what were they?

I used amule, amavisd-new, clamav, dovecot from the backports.org
archive.

I also used xbindkeys and xbindkeys-config from

deb http://b.berteau.free.fr/ stable main

Finally I installed mplayer from marillat repository


- Was the system pre-update a pure woody system? If not, which packages
  were not from woody?

Apart from the previously described unofficial woody packages, the
sistem was a pure woody system.

- Did any packages fail to upgrade?

No packages failed to upgrade.

- Were there any problems with the system after upgrading?


Further Comments/Problems:

I had to manually uninstall libtime-hires-perl, libdigest-md5-perl
and libmime-base64-perl. Anyway the further was signaled to me
by deborphan.
I also had to upgrade fetchmail by itself, beacuse the system wasn't
able to remove fetchmail-common.
Finally it was created a new file in /etc/init.d named mysqld.dpkg-dist.
I had to use it (and to rename it to mysqld) to be able to run mysql
daemon.

The other packets where upgraded very smoothly and my system is already
up and running. 
The only thing I can say is..well done guys!!


Please attach the output of "COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l" (or "env COLUMNS ...",
depending on your shell) from before and after the upgrade so that we
know what packages were installed on your system.

Doh! I forgot to save the output before the upgrade. I hope that the
output after the upgrade will be usefull

Attachment: dpkg
Description: Binary data


Reply to: