Michael, On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:51:51 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Since no-one in the systemd/udev team is using SPARC hardware, I was > > wondering, if vio_type would have a better home in e.g. the sparc-utils > > [2] package, where it would be maintained and tested by people with > > knowledge of that architecture. I don't think that would make much sense, and this belongs with the related utils in udev IMO. > > Seeing a bug report like [3], it's not actually clear to me, if vio_type > > is still functional with newer kernel releases and for which type of > > hardware this is actually required. I poked Marco about this, but he > > doesn't remember the details anymore. > > Your [3] points at an udev packaging bug. How does it relate to "newer kernel releases"? The hardware for which this is required was described in #526621, so I don't really get that question either... Puzzled, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature