Re: Kernel 2.4.16
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> Excellent, so you have a work around ~:^) Seriously, the kernel
> version will only give you better performance (depending on what the
> processor is), and who really needs that?
Performance and security. Well NFS is insecure anyway and I'm sitting
behind a firewall, but ...
> Anyway, this sounds like
> it could be something as silly as the whitespace character(s) used.
> Can you test for certain what they are on the three lines? Because
> it seems like the the second two lines are working, soooooo maybe
> you used a tab or two when the kernel server only likes spaces or
> something silly like that.
The lines are formated equally all with spaces (0x20). And I have to
say that I did many many experiments with those lines. After deleting
the broken line one other took its place. It's not that easy. :-(((
> All my machines running 2.4.recent and
> nfs-kernel-server work fine (for me (tm)) and use only spaces.
Perhaps a bug report against nfs-kernel-server in the sense
'Does not work like nfs-user-server with very same configuration'
is appropriate? What do you think about that?
Kind regards
Andreas.
Reply to: