Re: Unable to use smbfs even though compiled in.
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:07, Roy Bixler wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:40:20PM -0400, Robert C. Mosher II wrote:
> > I have been trying to compile a kernel to be used on several Ultra 5s in
> > my schools computer science lab. One of the main reasons I need to
> > recompile the kernel is so that smbfs will be supported. Although the
> > kernel compiles and is usable, smbfs is not supported:
> >
> > ERROR: smbfs filesystem not supported by the kernel
> > Please refer to the smbmnt(8) manual page
> > smbmnt failed: 255
>
> When you do 'lsmod', do you see something like the following?
>
> Module Size Used by Not tainted
> smbfs 39376 1 (autoclean)
>
Running 'lsmod' only gives me the headings. There are no modules listed.
> Also, do you have the 'smbfs' package installed?
>
> $ dpkg --list smbfs
I get the exact same output.
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
> ||/ Name Version Description
> +++-==============-==============-============================================
> ii smbfs 3.0.0beta1-1 mount and umount commands for the smbfs (for
>
> --
> Roy Bixler <rcb@ucp.uchicago.edu>
> The University of Chicago Press
Reply to: