Canonical URL for ‘tr9401.dtd’ not resolving
- To: debian-sgml@lists.debian.org
- Cc: 550052@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Canonical URL for ‘tr9401.dtd’ not resolving
- From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:20:25 +1000
- Message-id: <87ehzjkdxi.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au>
- In-reply-to: <15906.11268.711576.201824@columbo.globaltranscorp.org> (Mark Johnson's message of "Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:01:24 -0600")
- References: <15610.30942.859005.179043@mcgarrett.adsl.duke.edu> <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030112193240.11906A-100000@trillian.megadodo.umb> <15906.11268.711576.201824@columbo.globaltranscorp.org>
Howdy all,
I'm trying to address Bug#550052, so please keep that bug report
included in any relevant response from this.
In short: the ‘tr9401.dtd’ in the ‘w3c-dtd-xhtml’ package is catalogued
with a canonical URL that no longer resolves.
Mark Johnson <mrj@debian.org> writes:
> The dtds and the content models can be seen at one of the following:
>
> http://klecker.debian.org/~mrj/oasis/catalog/xml/
> http://globaltranscorp.org/oasis/catalog/xml/
No longer. The former times out, the latter domain doesn't resolve in DNS.
What should be the canonical URL for the ‘tr9401.dtd’ document?
Jor-el <jorel@austin.rr.com> writes:
> I took a look at the documents, above. What is the value in having
> the tr9401.dtd? The elements in an SOC catalog which have no equivalent in
> an XML Catalog should rightly be thrown away IMHO. SGML processors arent
> going to handle XML catalogs - which leaves only XML-based-technology
> processors using XML catalogs and so I fail to see the value in these
> elements. If you disagree, you'll have to enlighten me as to why.
I didn't see a response to that. Is there value to Debian in having the
‘w3c-dtd-xhtml’ package incorporate this document?
To address this bug I'd like to either find a justification for removing
the ‘tr9401.dtd’ document (and a mechanism for dropping it cleanly), or
find a reliable canonical URL for it.
--
\ “One of the most important things you learn from the internet |
`\ is that there is no ‘them’ out there. It's just an awful lot of |
_o__) ‘us’.” —Douglas Adams |
Ben Finney
Reply to: