Re: Debian LTS?

[Sythos <sythos@sythos.net>]

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 21:07:07 +0200
werner@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:

> And that's 2 years less for LTS ... especially in bigger Setup's
> LTS-Support is mandatory so there (because there is no Debian LTS's)
> Debian cannot be used due to the lack of Support. Instead - Redhat
> or Ubuntu or any other distribution with LTS-Support is used there.

3 years of direct support of "stable" and so 1-2 years of "oldstable"
support mean a amount of 4-5 years, please define again what you mean
for LTS...