Re: Re: Apt-get is insecure

To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re: Apt-get is insecure
From: ralphtheraccoon <ralphtheraccoon@uk2.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 18:01:21 +0200 (EET)
Message-id: <[🔎] 200112131601.fBDG1L7m019445@wapwas2.cytanet.com.cy>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 873d2f2kdf.fsf@puck.erasmus.jurri.net>
References: <[🔎] 873d2f2kdf.fsf@puck.erasmus.jurri.net> <[🔎] 20011213172418.A25716@karjala.org> <[🔎] 20011213152447.GV14968@wiggy.net> <[🔎] 877krr2ks9.fsf@puck.erasmus.jurri.net> <[🔎] 20011213154600.GA29713@atoom.net>

There isn't a "stable" debsig-verify or other package...
does this mean that "stable" is less secure than "unstable"?
If so... I'll probably be upgrading.

Dan

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>

References:
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Samuli Suonpaa <suonpaa@iki.fi>
- Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Alexander Karelas <karjala_lists@yahoo.co.uk>
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Samuli Suonpaa <suonpaa@iki.fi>
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Miek Gieben <miekg@atoom.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Next by Date: Re: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Previous by thread: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Next by thread: Re: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread