Re: "cupsys" renamed to "cups", please adjust your (build-)depends
* Nico Golde:
>> The source package has been renamed. This means that cupsys should be
>> added to the removed-packages file at some point. Vulnerabilities
>> should be marked as <removed> for unstable and cupsys, and as <unfixed>
>> for cups (or annotated with the proper version).
>
> If I add cupsys to the removed-packages file is an
> additional <removed> tag in CVE/list still needed?
Yes, otherwise the issue is not marked as unfixed for etch et al.
Reply to: