Re: Removal requests submitted for CERNLIB packages
Le mercredi 09 mars 2011 à 20:59 +0800, Lifeng Sun a écrit :
> Hello Bastien,
>
> On 15:25 Tue 03/08/11 Mar , Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES
> > <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Le samedi 5 mars 2011 22:33:08, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > >> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 09:00:36AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > >> > Note that the packages will still be available on snapshot.d.o if
> > >> > someone wants to adopt them. So I don't see any reason for delaying the
> > >> > removal.
> > >>
> > >> I'd see a reason for delaying removal because two people here expressed
> > >> explicite interest to continue and it would not make much sense to keep
> > >> ftpmaster busy with first removing and later adding the package. However,
> > >> I'd regard it reasonable to have a dealine of say eight weeks for either
> > >> uploading packages which fix the most urgent bugs or actively discussing
> > >> potential issues which might block such an upload.
> > >>
> > >> I'd be actually happy if these packages would be kept but I do not have
> > >> time to deal with them myself. I'd volunteer to sponsor uploads if
> > >> needed.
> > >
> > > Will create a git repo with last upstream and use gitpkg to build them
> > > Bastien
> > >
> > >> Kind regards
> > >>
> > >> Andreas.
> > >
> > I have just created a cernlib.git under debian science with dsfg clean source
>
> I did some work for cernlib, and imported DFSG clean source of paw and
> mclibs into git repositories. Since my request to join in the team has
> not been approved yet, I host them on github [1-3], could you please
> kindly help me to pull or clone them into alioth? Thanks.
I accepted your application in the Debian Science team on alioth . You
should be able to do it yourself.
Sylvestre
Reply to: