[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1009656: marked as done (reportbug: with bullseye-pu, claims "This package doesn't appear to exist")



Your message dated Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:33:52 +0000
with message-id <E1nkkQC-0009wE-6b@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1009656: fixed in reportbug 11.5.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1009656,
regarding reportbug: with bullseye-pu, claims "This package doesn't appear to exist"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1009656: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009656
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug
Version: 11.4.1
Severity: normal

I just had the following interaction with reportbug:

-----
erdos:~ $ reportbug release.debian.org
*** Welcome to reportbug.  Use ? for help at prompts. ***
Note: bug reports are publicly archived (including the email address of the submitter).
Detected character set: UTF-8
Please change your locale if this is incorrect.

Using 'Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org>' as your from address.
Will send report to Debian (per lsb_release).
What sort of request is this? (If none of these things mean anything to you, or
you are trying to report a bug in an existing package, please press Enter to
exit reportbug.)

1 binnmu       binNMU requests
2 britney      testing migration script bugs
3 bullseye-pu  bullseye proposed updates requests
4 buster-pu    buster proposed updates requests
5 other        None of the other options
6 rm           Stable/Testing removal requests
7 transition   transition tracking
8 unblock      unblock requests

Choose the request type: 3
Please enter the name of the package: spyder
Checking package information...
This package doesn't appear to exist; continue [y|N|?]? y
Latest version seems to be 4.2.1+dfsg1-3, is this the proper one [Y|n|?]? 
-----

It says the package doesn't appear to exist, but then knows it's
version number!

Best wishes,

   Julian

-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
EDITOR="emacs -nw"
PAGER="less"
VISUAL="emacs -nw"
DEBEMAIL="jdg@debian.org"
DEBFULLNAME="Julian Gilbey"
INTERFACE="text"

** /home/jdg/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "3.15"
mode expert
ui text
realname "Julian Gilbey"
email "jdg@debian.org"
no-query-bts

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers stable-security
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.16.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii  apt                2.4.4
ii  python3            3.9.8-1
ii  python3-reportbug  11.4.1
ii  sensible-utils     0.0.17

reportbug recommends no packages.

Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
pn  claws-mail                                 <none>
ii  debconf                                    1.5.79
ii  debsums                                    3.0.2
ii  dlocate                                    1.10
ii  emacs-bin-common                           1:27.1+1-3.1+b1
ii  exim4                                      4.95-5
ii  exim4-daemon-heavy [mail-transport-agent]  4.95-5
ii  file                                       1:5.41-2
ii  gnupg                                      2.2.27-3
pn  python3-urwid                              <none>
pn  reportbug-gtk                              <none>
ii  xdg-utils                                  1.1.3-4.1

Versions of packages python3-reportbug depends on:
ii  apt                2.4.4
ii  file               1:5.41-2
ii  python3            3.9.8-1
ii  python3-apt        2.3.0+b1
ii  python3-debian     0.1.43
ii  python3-debianbts  3.2.0
ii  python3-requests   2.27.1+dfsg-1
ii  sensible-utils     0.0.17

python3-reportbug suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: reportbug
Source-Version: 11.5.0
Done: Nis Martensen <nis.martensen@web.de>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
reportbug, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1009656@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nis Martensen <nis.martensen@web.de> (supplier of updated reportbug package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:10:55 +0200
Source: reportbug
Architecture: source
Version: 11.5.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reportbug Maintainers <debian-reportbug@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Nis Martensen <nis.martensen@web.de>
Closes: 813299 887150 890680 918431 927400 1007106 1009656
Changes:
 reportbug (11.5.0) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Mickaël Schoentgen ]
   * reportbug/submit.py: remove usage of the deprecated 'U' mode
   * reportbug/utils.py: fix bytes comparison deprecation warning
   * reportbug/debbugs.py, reportbug/submit.py, reportbug/utils.py:
     prevent resource warnings about unclosed file
   * bin/reportbug, reportbug/debbugs.py, reportbug/submit.py,
     reportbug/ui/text_ui.py, reportbug/urlutils.py:
     remove usage of obsolete IOError
 .
   [ Nis Martensen ]
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: improve description of the a11y tag.
     Thanks to Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> for the suggestion.
     (Closes: #1007106)
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: use version for package exists check.
     Thanks to Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> for the report.
     (Closes: #1009656)
   * bin/reportbug: name matching file instead of regex with -f
     (Closes: #918431)
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: always ask version for release.debian.org/-pu
     requests (Closes: #887150)
   * reportbug/checkversions.py: do not restrict dists in madison query
     by default (Closes: #813299, #927400)
   * reportbug/utils.py: add and revise docstrings
   * reportbug/mailer.py: add docstrings
   * reportbug/debbugs.py: add docstrings
   * reportbug/submit.py: add docstrings
   * reportbug/urlutils.py: add docstrings
   * reportbug/checkversions.py: add/update docstrings
   * reportbug/hiermatch.py: update/revise docstrings
   * reportbug/checkbuildd.py: update/extend docstring
   * reportbug/tempfiles.py: add/revise docstrings (Closes: #890680)
Checksums-Sha1:
 768a72844adf5ba25905b2f4aa24dea7f7afe5af 1888 reportbug_11.5.0.dsc
 69c953ead505c52bedaa4d90f1bfbdfc9d16505a 211708 reportbug_11.5.0.tar.xz
 d7ff7da96d22b93eb3401aee7d1bba65b297ee96 7551 reportbug_11.5.0_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 9880fda242bd6321ee12c7488c390ae36817afe11ae74cd140a0e427cd45ee64 1888 reportbug_11.5.0.dsc
 9bac4ef742804d34808fd373f7845ac794c33d97bf8fc585227a68e8a0acd1ec 211708 reportbug_11.5.0.tar.xz
 5cf641f504d33971c5cda654fa2423b158be3cd260209b7f9bee3108c5f14615 7551 reportbug_11.5.0_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 ea8af82c37c14ea4617cfe50217b6b26 1888 utils standard reportbug_11.5.0.dsc
 6289586f5da212bc7d40a476f55aa968 211708 utils standard reportbug_11.5.0.tar.xz
 922d8010df950ce46749772ffb1b9946 7551 utils standard reportbug_11.5.0_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEElwagcOR0bw2C8YAgINUE/crqn1AFAmJtDIcACgkQINUE/crq
n1BB4g//ZViOH2hh6Dr7oVCDwKHVzbGVnNWwmhD4Xb7nuowyiFVLLbakXPqqi2ZV
FjJJx3sYIqpZvzRGvPAwdOXlGrAF42TezCxSeK7t8QrM92FSebvtSzeUuIfcf7MS
a1B/uhAxFSAzLdeqx7rY4SRticPRNi5+/6WxYrgv+ZDaquYOXSKBUeQrlFbLLbPz
Z8l1HkpD9Av04UN7sO0gj0mL9n3g2pmNDzyHV3S7S3CIEC1PkKGo0zVEUe4/slIE
p7j+DJtWL0pRGOvM2k5hsPsNWYyZ1hx3uTB9fmudxI9WuxxRJPTNL/RbPP4lkt1+
LxnMP9X8X9iZg8F7Bl1jy1yOISKjLrAxFQpSSeQEYwBKj444ns6gW8Ep0K/kY/Xe
87t66f/eaupAbR6Rq7OCvw9ZInXjEMMcKhqTzWu06d/3svsIjFccDy8Ihv6yzMJE
pwzbYgSdxGtf8mfOPhjSdXt34WvpvqnJ4o5ijLAmCUW2RaMfmwP1+11wwygEDmMD
k116CIK+Uh31W0cEqnhPr50kthIppSCvBuMOx8O8CeVIF2DsGKYJB2dfDiSd6BJs
wCDV17M1Tr8isyK0XSlCQ8Fzq3oo8OP0e+ddZnImoNQfYQFeKnqtQDD2zWiZ3LEb
eKQCXIrRYASpg3omh0elCSdpcpn+1RphHWgKU7GMQL4PvC1GcG0=
=tLKs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: