[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#990267: marked as done (reportbug: why suggesting debconf-utils)

Your message dated Thu, 26 Aug 2021 04:19:30 +0000
with message-id <E1mJ6rS-0004ZA-Vh@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#990267: fixed in reportbug 11.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #990267,
regarding reportbug: why suggesting debconf-utils
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
990267: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990267
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: reportbug
Version: 7.10.3
Severity: normal



Hey.

AFAICS, report doesn't use anything from debconf-utils, only debconf-show which
is however in package debconf.

Did I miss anything or is the Suggests on debconf-utils unnecessary?


Cheers,
Chris.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: reportbug
Source-Version: 11.0.0
Done: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
reportbug, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 990267@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> (supplier of updated reportbug package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 23:54:19 -0400
Source: reportbug
Architecture: source
Version: 11.0.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reportbug Maintainers <debian-reportbug@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
Closes: 988391 990267 992332
Changes:
 reportbug (11.0.0) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Thomas Goirand ]
   * Update suite names vs stable/oldstable, so it's possible to request for
     bullseye-pu (Closes: #992332).
 .
   [ Nis Martensen ]
   * man/reportbug.1: advise -H users to use --list-cc (Closes: #988391)
 .
   [ Sandro Tosi ]
   * Release reportbug 11, matching Debian Bullseye release number
   * debian/control
     - run wrap-and-sort
     - switch Suggests to debconf, since we're using the binary debconf-show,
       included in that package; Closes: #990267
Checksums-Sha1:
 edd993669a75f97640549a9a1a4f23ad324e79e5 1888 reportbug_11.0.0.dsc
 b313f98e8657322e3001b69e62a4523f2c4a2429 232184 reportbug_11.0.0.tar.xz
 44b70a2c0bb2e0b42b6e01ed202fbd0af2ef48c7 6362 reportbug_11.0.0_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 3da5ce47383a7d320de52b77ce8195ef57b878d21ba90b43903c91fe80672be3 1888 reportbug_11.0.0.dsc
 343ac4379df75ebf5336fbef9fd9d2f2c32c5ba2dbd6b65452d6184de21bfc5c 232184 reportbug_11.0.0.tar.xz
 d7d4162340655b602c8739c354b0a521864c0c541cd00eeb80e7bd636ff16340 6362 reportbug_11.0.0_source.buildinfo
Files:
 f2a3b632b5ed80dc8251f50ff6f22be8 1888 utils standard reportbug_11.0.0.dsc
 2d74a89a016d3766ead34516ce1ad275 232184 utils standard reportbug_11.0.0.tar.xz
 1db348d3f7f3f2db6ccf6361e360d7b1 6362 utils standard reportbug_11.0.0_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=fhCc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: