Bug#922058: reportbug: Please support the neomutt MUA
Package: reportbug
Version: 7.5.2
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
reportbug currently supports calling 2 MUAs: mutt or nmh.
Please consider either
1) supporting neomutt as a MUA (same options as mutt)
2) supporting setting arbitrary executables and CLI parameters in the `mua` option
Best,
nicoo
- -- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
EDITOR="emacsclient"
PAGER="less"
DEBEMAIL="nicoo@debian.org"
DEBFULLNAME="Nicolas Braud-Santoni"
INTERFACE="text"
** /home/nicoo/.reportbugrc:
mode advanced
ui text
sign gpg
no-query-bts
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 1.8.0~rc2
ii python3 3.7.2-1
ii python3-reportbug 7.5.2
ii sensible-utils 0.0.12
reportbug recommends no packages.
Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
pn claws-mail <none>
ii debconf-utils 1.5.70
ii debsums 2.2.3
pn dlocate <none>
pn emacs24-bin-common | emacs25-bin-common <none>
ii file 1:5.35-2
ii gnupg 2.2.12-1
ii msmtp-mta [mail-transport-agent] 1.8.2-1
pn python3-urwid <none>
pn reportbug-gtk <none>
ii xdg-utils 1.1.3-1
Versions of packages python3-reportbug depends on:
ii apt 1.8.0~rc2
ii file 1:5.35-2
ii python3 3.7.2-1
ii python3-apt 1.8.3
ii python3-debian 0.1.34
ii python3-debianbts 2.8.2
ii python3-requests 2.20.0-2
python3-reportbug suggests no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=VX1R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: