Re: liborcus / boost1.83 and time_t
Hi,
Am 30.03.24 um 08:49 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
That would mean a bin-NMU of liborcus would work and then a rebuild of
libreoffice (gb, but I need a new upload anyway)
So we probably missed a rename? (Or more for stuff silently using
time-date?)
boost1.83 (iostream)? liborcus? Both?
I prepared a time_t rename of liborcus. Can upload it (to NEW...) any time.
A bin-NMU would also work, except for a needed runtime dependency, then
again it's "only" the gnumeric filter...). I wouldn't mind a simple
bin-NMU at least.
(I also uploaded libreoffice build-depending on
liborcus-dev (>> 0.19.2-3+b1) on armhf)
Ran the full tests with it. Passed.
Though still I wonder whether something needs to be done for boost, too.
(Probably a problem since it's header-only in parts) and whether I am
the only one...
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: