Bug#1018945: transition: libbpf

[Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 8:14 PM Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2022-11-05 00:11:07 +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> > --
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 10:22:32PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > As of today only v4l-utils and bpfcc still fails to build with libbpf
> > > in experimental.
> > >
> > > v4l-utils is a key package, I will look into its fix and request the
> > > libbpf transition after that.
> >
> > All the packages except bpfcc (#1018818) now builds fine with libbpf/1.0.1-1
> > from experimental. I can help bpfcc maintainers with the porting to new libbpf
> > but they have not replied to the bug report or to my mails.
> >
> > Please consider libbpf for transition.
>
> Please go ahead

Thanks. Has been uploaded.


-- 
Regards
Sudip