On 2022-09-19 13:28:21 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2022-09-19 12:47, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-09-19 11:54:36 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > This transition can be considered done, if we're happy with the
> > state of
> > rheolef reported by
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mumps.html
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rheolef
>
> It's only done when the old mumps libraries are removed from testing.
> That's currently blocked by getfem and rheolef:
...
> The both need to be fixed or removed from testing.
I see it, thanks for the clarification.
What's the plan regarding getfem++/getfem? It looks like some package
renaming was started in unstable but it was never finished.