Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 15:16:57 +0100 with message-id <YgfBWQV6cXjHdYDw@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#1002286: Acknowledgement (transition: Gazebo + Ignition libraries) has caused the Debian Bug report #1002286, regarding transition: Gazebo + Ignition libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1002286: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002286 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: Gazebo + Ignition libraries
- From: Jose Luis Rivero <jrivero@osrfoundation.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:33:26 +0000
- Message-id: <164010800679.12967.2021152841110394971.reportbug@localhost>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello: The motivation for this bug is to manage the join transition from experimental of the packages corresponding to gazebo and the following ignition/sdformat libraries which are dependencies of gazebo (unstable version11.9.1+dfsg-2): - sdformat (unstable version 9.3.0) - ignition-transport (unstable version 8.0.0) - ignition-msgs (unstable version 5.1.0) - ignition-common (unstable version 3.14.0) - ignition-fuel-tools (unstable version 4.1.0) These set of dependencies have been moved to their own versioned source packages since ignition/sdformat versions need to be upgraded to new major versions but we need Gazebo to keep working (it uses exactly these set of major versions) until people migrate to Ignition (successor of Gazebo). So we have in experimental: - Gazebo 11.9.1+dfsg-4 depending now on new packages only in experimental: (note that packages are different from unstable, using major versions) - sdformat9 - ignition-transport8 - ignition-msgs5 (this is also in unstable) - ignition-common3 - ignition-fuel-tools4 Also in experimental, new versions of ignition packages are ready: - sdformat (unstable 9.3.0 -> experimental 12.3.0) - ignition-transport (unstable 8.0.0 -> experimental 8.2.1) - ignition-msgs (unstable 5.1.0 -> experimental 8.1.0) - ignition-common (unstable 3.14.0 -> experimental 4.4.0) - ignition-fuel-tools (unstable 4.1.0 -> experimental 7.0.0) The only packages listed in the ben tracker that could be broken by updating the current unstable ignition and sdformat are gazebo and their own interdependencies among this group. My plan would be to upload everything at once since we won't face any breakage if the following is correct: - gazebo would not be broken since it will use a new set of ignition packages - ignition/sdformat packages won't be broken since all them will be built using the new versions coming from experimental. Is this approach correct? Is there any side-effect that could appear that I'm not aware of? Thanks!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Jose Luis Rivero <jrivero@openrobotics.org>, 1002286-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1002286: Acknowledgement (transition: Gazebo + Ignition libraries)
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 15:16:57 +0100
- Message-id: <YgfBWQV6cXjHdYDw@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <CAFPSYgpUb0GQwta4Suo4Sj1Up8mjDihTxfBNqkzX39CMUjSzZA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <handler.1002286.B.164010805312562.ack@bugs.debian.org> <164010800679.12967.2021152841110394971.reportbug@localhost> <CAFPSYgotiEHgt0_33zNpUUuQH4fMhnMrSQnn55e7C6nQuCmMfQ@mail.gmail.com> <Ydxppk8QaEkTKbcU@ramacher.at> <164010800679.12967.2021152841110394971.reportbug@localhost> <CAFPSYgpUb0GQwta4Suo4Sj1Up8mjDihTxfBNqkzX39CMUjSzZA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2022-01-12 16:04:31 +0100, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 6:15 PM Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> > wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > On 2022-01-10 17:41:17, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > > I have received no negative feedback or blockers in the last 20 days, I'm > > > afraid that we can not wait > > > much longer since this bug is blocking others (like Dartsim transition). > > My > > > plan would be to proceed > > > with the plan in the next few days unless feedback appears in the next 48 > > > hours. > > > > These transitions are self-contained and gazebo is not in testing. I > > think you can just go ahead with the uploads. > > > > Thanks Sebastian for double checking. I proceeded yesterday with the upload > of the whole set of 10 packages to unstable. As far as I can tell nothing > is > broken as of now. > > I'll close the bug in a few days if no problems appear. That's done. Cheers > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Sebastian Ramacher > > -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---