[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#992563: transition: gdal



On 2021-09-23 11:44:14 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 9/23/21 11:40 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2021-09-23 11:34:21, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >> On 9/18/21 9:57 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >>> On 2021-09-18 07:01:38 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >>>> On 9/12/21 7:54 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Quite a few packages on mipsel may need a binNMU for the recent glibc
> >>>> changes, it allowed libgdal-grass to migrate, but there a still quite a
> >>>> few packages with remaining issues:
> >>>>
> >>>>  https://linuxminded.nl/debian/gis-transitions/testing/html/gdal.html
> >>>
> >>> There are a over 200 packages and a bunch of binNMUs that are blocked by
> >>> glibc. I'm slowly wading through that list.
> >>
> >> glibc migrated to testing, this allowed a few packages that are part of
> >> the gdal & pdal transitions to migrate but there are still outstanding
> >> issues.
> >>
> >> In the britney update_output.txt you see these packages as reasons why
> >> the old gdal & pdal library cannot be removed, but you don't see
> >> attempts to migrate those packages.
> >>
> >> r-cran-rgdal and r-cran-sf are blocked by r-base.
> > 
> > They have been binNMUed in testing-proposed-updates and should migrate
> > to testing in the next run.
> > 
> >> What is preventing vtk7 and paraview from migrating?
> > 
> >>From https://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html: both the
> > paraview and vtk7 binNMUs are blocked by openmpi.
> 
> Thanks, I was looking at:
> 
>  https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=paraview
>  https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=vtk7
> 
> There is also postgis which is blocked by a piuparts regression that's
> not actually caused by postgis. piuparts-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
> has been contacted about that last week, but no response so far.

Why is it failing? Have bugs been filed for this issue?

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: