[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)



Hello,

Am Sonntag, dem 05.09.2021 um 09:48 +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
[...]
> without any  coordination or a transition approved on debian-release.
> That a transition would be needed was viisble since months at
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-box2d.html.
> 
> 
> @release: please bin-NMU ( at least libreoffice builds, didn't try
> caveexpress):
> 
> nmu libreoffice . ANY . -m 'rebuild against libbox2d2' ]
> 
> nmu libreoffice . ANY . experimental . -m 'changelog entry/dep-wait expr.' ]
> 
> 
> caveexpress is the only other affected package - and (expectedly)
> doesn't build anymore:

[...]

There is no coordination needed because I am the maintainer of box2d and
caveexpress. Another upload of caveexpress will follow today. A bin-nmu is not
necessary and should have never been requested.

Regards,

Markus


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: