Bug#983531: buster-pu: package python2.7/2.7.16-2+deb10u2

To: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>, 983531@bugs.debian.org, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Cc: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#983531: buster-pu: package python2.7/2.7.16-2+deb10u2
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:46:38 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 201600a17b2b31e0ae1a4277d5c075608140196b.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Reply-to: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, 983531@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20210226153002.la6nn6vhigscabul@inutil.org>
References: <161427847020.218310.18064501829582072467.reportbug@hullmann.westfalen.local> <9877d8be-6b2e-49e5-1a5c-4b8f4ba3cf4b@debian.org> <161427847020.218310.18064501829582072467.reportbug@hullmann.westfalen.local> <20210226153002.la6nn6vhigscabul@inutil.org> <161427847020.218310.18064501829582072467.reportbug@hullmann.westfalen.local>

On Fri, 2021-02-26 at 16:30 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 07:49:38AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 2/25/21 7:41 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > +  * CVE-2021-3177
> > 
> > are all the ctypes tests passing with this patch? See #983516.
> 
> I'll have a look at Marc' updated patch and revise if needed.

Was there a conclusion on that?

Regards,

Adam

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#983531: buster-pu: package python2.7/2.7.16-2+deb10u2
  - From: Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#984604: buster-pu: package sabnzbdplus/2.3.6+dfsg-1
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#984790: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7
Previous by thread: Bug#983485: buster-pu: package m2crypto/0.31.0-4+deb10u2
Next by thread: Bug#983531: buster-pu: package python2.7/2.7.16-2+deb10u2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread