Your message dated Wed, 6 Jan 2021 13:15:19 +0100 with message-id <X/Wp1xyBp9GpqrTL@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#978722: nmu: nheko_0.7.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #978722, regarding nmu: nheko_0.7.2-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 978722: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978722 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: nmu: nheko_0.7.2-3
- From: Hubert Chathi <hubert@uhoreg.ca>
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:57:32 -0500
- Message-id: <874kk3ggg3.fsf@svladcjelli.uhoreg.ca>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu It looks like there was a bug in libfmt which caused its dependent packages to be lacking a "Depends: libfmt7". Rebuilding against the latest libfmt-dev fixes this. So I'm requesting to rebuild nheko 0.7.2-3 to fix #978640. nmu nheko_0.7.2-3 . ANY . -m "rebuild against new libfmt" Thanks
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: David Vo <david@vovo.id.au>, 978722-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#978722: nmu: nheko_0.7.2-3
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 13:15:19 +0100
- Message-id: <X/Wp1xyBp9GpqrTL@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3df51de2-17b4-d268-3b42-f01028471e44@vovo.id.au>
- References: <874kk3ggg3.fsf@svladcjelli.uhoreg.ca> <20201230213513.GA31560@ramacher.at> <20201230213513.GA31560@ramacher.at> <874kk3ggg3.fsf@svladcjelli.uhoreg.ca> <[🔎] 3df51de2-17b4-d268-3b42-f01028471e44@vovo.id.au>
On 2021-01-06 22:48:48 +1100, David Vo wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 22:35:13 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher > <sramacher@debian.org> wrote: > > This needs an upload of spdlog first. See #978471. > > Looks like that has happened now. Is there anything else blocking this? No, the binNMU has already already scheduled. Closing. Cheers -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---