Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2016 09:48:48 +0200 with message-id <574D41E0.3060403@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#823034: transition: rrdtool has caused the Debian Bug report #823034, regarding transition: rrdtool to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 823034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823034 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: rrdtool
- From: Jean-Michel Vourgère <nirgal@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 08:21:16 +0000
- Message-id: <57246AFC.6020907@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-rrdtool-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org Hello dear release team rrdtool bumped its soname for 4 to 8 in version 1.6. The library is now thead safe, so that librrd_th.so is gone. Regular librrd.so should be used whether thread safety is required or not. Inside this library, the symbol removal does not affect any of Debian architectures. Only non-posix ones are impacted. rrdtool version 1.6 is now in experimental. The "auto-rrdtool transition" [1] lists the 10 packages that will need to be bin-nmu'd: title = "rrdtool"; is_affected = .depends ~ "librrd4" | .depends ~ "librrd8"; is_good = .depends ~ "librrd8"; is_bad = .depends ~ "librrd4"; Library packages are co-installable. All 8 packages that built from source still do with version 1.6. I don't expect any trouble. The only bug I could find is about collectd, currently FTBFS, that will display a bogus message during compilation, and will performed its own mutex locking at runtime. See #823012 and #822397. Please tell me when it's ok to upload to unstable. [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-rrdtool.html -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Marc Fournier <marc@bl.uem.li>, 823034-done@bugs.debian.org, Jean-Michel Vourgère <nirgal@debian.org>
- Cc: Sebastian Harl <tokkee@debian.org>, Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Subject: Re: Bug#823034: transition: rrdtool
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 09:48:48 +0200
- Message-id: <574D41E0.3060403@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20160525214145.GA25404@lonquimay.wrk.lsn.camptocamp.com>
- References: <57246AFC.6020907@debian.org> <[🔎] 57289478.5080806@debian.org> <[🔎] 57409566.70607@debian.org> <[🔎] 20160525214145.GA25404@lonquimay.wrk.lsn.camptocamp.com>
On 25/05/16 23:41, Marc Fournier wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 05:05:42PM +0000, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: >> Hi >> >> Last package using librrd4 is collectd. > > Thanks for the heads up ! > > I just uploaded collectd 5.5.1-3, which includes the patch you submitted in > #823012. Thanks so much for taking care of all this Jean-Michel ! This transition is over now. Cheers, Emilio
--- End Message ---