Your message dated Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:44:16 +0100 with message-id <564EDD60.8090205@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#803997: transition: polarssl has caused the Debian Bug report #803997, regarding transition: polarssl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 803997: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803997 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: polarssl
- From: James Cowgill <james410@cowgill.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 03:02:45 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1446606165.10128.25.camel@cowgill.org.uk>
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-polarssl.html X-Debbugs-CC: polarssl@packages.debian.org Hi, polarssl needs a library transition. The name of the upstream project changed to 'mbedtls' so the SONAME has become 'libmbedtls9'. I've kept the name of the dev package as 'libpolarssl-dev' for the 1.3 series so every package doesn't need to be changed. The new version of polarssl fixes a grave security bug (#801413). I havn't got a response from the package maintainer at all in dealing with this so I NMUed the version currently in experimental. There is a build failure on s309x, but the fix should be a 1 line change which I'd like to make when I upload the package to unstable. If you'd prefer I could make another NMU to experimental instead. Thanks, James Ben file (the automatic one is fine): title = "polarssl"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libpolarssl7" | .depends ~ "libmbedtls9"; is_good = .depends ~ "libmbedtls9"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libpolarssl7";Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: James Cowgill <james410@cowgill.org.uk>
- Cc: 803997-done@bugs.debian.org, polarssl@packages.debian.org, Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
- Subject: Re: Bug#803997: transition: polarssl
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:44:16 +0100
- Message-id: <564EDD60.8090205@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 56423D93.2070500@debian.org>
- References: <[🔎] 1446606165.10128.25.camel@cowgill.org.uk> <[🔎] 5640E39C.3090605@debian.org> <[🔎] 1447098563.2400.1.camel@cowgill.org.uk> <[🔎] 56423D93.2070500@debian.org>
On 10/11/15 19:55, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 09/11/15 20:49, James Cowgill wrote: >> Thinking about this, I could probably avoid this transition by waiting >> for mbedtls to pass NEW, porting all the rdeps, and then having >> polarssl removed from the archive. This would be the "end" goal anyway. > > I'd prefer that. We can let polarssl get auto-removed from testing (or I may > just remove it together with the rdeps). As for stable, if the package is FUBAR > then you can request a removal from there in a separate bug. So we don't need this transition bug anymore. Let's close this. Cheers, Emilio
--- End Message ---