On Apr16 11:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > One thing that wasn't absolutely clear from the original (although I guess > was potentially implied) is whether any of the fixes which are relevant have > previously been applied in some way to the packages in unstable. All the fixes are backports from upstream which are included in package currently in unstable (5.5.x) > On a related note, it would be appreciated if comments such as "cleanup > series" were more verbose in future, as it appears to have involved removing > enabled patches (which ones hopes have been replaced by newer patches) as > well as those which were already disabled. I will be more versbose on those; it was commented patches in series, so not used; this modification has also been made in unstable. -- William
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature