[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#667906: marked as done (transition: libffi6)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:13:23 +0100
with message-id <20140124071323.GJ4822@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#667906: transition: libffi
has caused the Debian Bug report #667906,
regarding transition: libffi6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
667906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Tags: wheezy, sid
Severity: normal
There shouldn't be any new build failures with this transition (at least Ubuntu didn't see any).
A large number of binNMUs could be avoided if Haskell wouldn't hard code libffi dependencies in every haskell package (see #639015). 

The transition should be done before the freeze for wheezy.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Apr  7, 2012 at 13:39:45 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Tags: wheezy, sid
> Severity: normal
> 
> There shouldn't be any new build failures with this transition (at
> least Ubuntu didn't see any).
> 
Finally, libffi5 is gone from sid and testing as of a couple days ago.
Closing.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: