On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 19:16:06 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2013-05-16 Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > > If the libraries aren't intended to be co-installable, why are they in > > > > separate source packages? > >> The library packages are co-installable, the development packages > >> can't be, due to libtasn1.so. > > > What's the reason for them being versioned? > > There was a minor API break, e.g. gnutls << 2.12.21 cannot be build > against libtasn1-6. > That's not a reason to version the dev packages. Especially if you don't plan on keeping both around for a long time. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature