Bug#670858: marked as done (RM: node/0.3.2-7.1)
Your message dated Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:25:15 -0500
with message-id <20120429222514.GA2554@burratino>
and subject line Re: RM: node/0.3.2-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #670858,
regarding RM: node/0.3.2-7.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
670858: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670858
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: node@packages.debian.org
Hi,
Please remove the ham radio server "node" from testing. The
release-critical bug #614907 has had no action for several months
despite a starting patch and various compromises offered, and I am not
confident that the bug will be fixed in time for wheezy.
The package hasn't been uploaded for the past two years.
It would be dishonest to commit to maintaining this package for the
course of another stable release if it remains in this state. I hope
that this removal would be temporary and it would not remain in this
state, though.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
Thanks,
Jonathan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 614907 + sid experimental
quit
Philipp Kern wrote:
> nodejs is not in testing, so #614907 cannot, as a conflict solely within
> unstable, be a rationale by itself for testing removal.
Heh. Okay. (I'm still concerned about the lack of maintenance but
can't see anything easy to do about it.)
> (I'm with you that it
> should be resolved with nodejs getting the name, but that's my personal
> opinion.)
I found what Russ wrote on -devel convincing:
| In an ideal world, *neither* application would be using "node", since it's
| a very generic name, but the reality is that people go off and do things
So regardless of what happens to the "node" name, I would like to have
nodejs and ax25-node commands present in Debian and upstream to allow
users to benefit as though in that ideal world if they want to. But
that is neither here nor there.
Thanks for a quick response.
Jonathan
--- End Message ---
Reply to: