[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please remove iceowl from testing



On 2012-04-04 13:42, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> iceowl (the standalone mozilla calendar sunbird) isn't maintained
> upstream anymore. Please remove it from testing (it has already been
> removed from unstable). The package will be maintained in experimental.
> Cheers,
>  -- Guido
> 
> 

Hi,

This happens automatically when the last dependency of iceowl is gone
from testing.  In this case, that appears to be iceowl-l10n/1.0~b2-1
(see below).

~Niels


$ dak rm -nR -s testing iceowl
Working... done.
Will remove the following packages from testing:

calendar-google-provider |   1.0~b2-6 | [...]
calendar-timezones |   1.0~b2-6 | [...]
    iceowl |   1.0~b2-6 | [...]
iceowl-dbg |   1.0~b2-6 | [...]
iceowl-extension |   1.0~b2-6 | [...]

Maintainer: Alexander Sack <asac@debian.org>

------------------- Reason -------------------

----------------------------------------------

Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
iceowl-l10n: iceowl-l10n-ca
             iceowl-l10n-cs
             iceowl-l10n-da
             iceowl-l10n-de
             iceowl-l10n-es-ar
             iceowl-l10n-es-es
             iceowl-l10n-et
             iceowl-l10n-eu
             iceowl-l10n-fr
             iceowl-l10n-fy-nl
             iceowl-l10n-ga-ie
             iceowl-l10n-hu
             iceowl-l10n-id
             iceowl-l10n-is
             iceowl-l10n-it
             iceowl-l10n-ja
             iceowl-l10n-ko
             iceowl-l10n-lt
             iceowl-l10n-nb-no
             iceowl-l10n-nl
             iceowl-l10n-nn-no
             iceowl-l10n-pa-in
             iceowl-l10n-pl
             iceowl-l10n-pt-br
             iceowl-l10n-pt-pt
             iceowl-l10n-ru
             iceowl-l10n-si
             iceowl-l10n-sk
             iceowl-l10n-sl
             iceowl-l10n-tr
             iceowl-l10n-uk
             iceowl-l10n-vi
             iceowl-l10n-zh-cn
             iceowl-l10n-zh-tw

Dependency problem found.


Reply to: