[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#603781: marked as done (unblock: superiotool)

Your message dated Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:36:22 +0100
with message-id <4D0121A6.1060303@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#603781: unblock: superiotool
has caused the Debian Bug report #603781,
regarding unblock: superiotool
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
603781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org

I discovered that the version of superiotool in unstable was blocked from 
entering testing due to not being built on ia64 (according to 
grep-excuses). But looking at

https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=superiotool

lists it as being uploaded (although the "Last State Change" date is 
weird). However the ia64 version of r5050 isn't in the pool either. I think 
wanna-build is confused and this prevented the ia64 buildd from building it 
and thus it was blocked for a long time from entering testing.

The package currently has no bugs. It's a utility for determining what 
super i/o chipset your system has, mostly useful for coreboot development. 
The newer version is able to recognize more chipsets, the version currently 
in squeeze (0.0+r3844-1) was uploaded in Dec 2008 and is not so useful.

Assuming it builds on ia64, this version should have been in testing 
anyway, and allowing it in now represents very little risk.

Could someone kick w-b and if it builds please consider unblocking?

Thanks,

-- 
Matt Taggart
taggart@debian.org

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 24/11/2010 09:24, Matt Taggart wrote:

FWIW it *is* in the tag database:

superiotool | 0.0+r3844-1 |       testing | source, amd64, armel, i386, kfr=
eebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
superiotool | 0.0+r3844-1 |      unstable | source
superiotool | 0.0+r3844-1+b2 |       testing | ia64
superiotool | 0.0+r3844-1+b2 |      unstable | ia64
superiotool | 0.0+r5050-1 |      unstable | source, alpha, amd64, armel, i3=
86, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386

So you do want a removal from unstable of that binNMU.


Fixed with the closing of #603962.



Unblocked.

Regards,

--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
mehdi@{dogguy.org,debian.org}

--- End Message ---
Reply to: