[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Security bugfix #595248: please unblock libnusoap-php



Oh, and btw, please use a proper 'from' or reply-to address if you post
and eventually expect a response...

Here's the message I've sent to you earlier, but which bounced on
"Thomas Goirand (GPLHost)" <thomas@goirand.nospam.fr> :-/

Le mercredi 08 décembre 2010 à 13:50 +0100, Olivier Berger a écrit :
> Hi.
> 
> Le mercredi 08 décembre 2010 à 19:57 +0800, Thomas Goirand (GPLHost) a
> écrit :
> > On 09/08/2010 12:02 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > That leads me to say that I would suggest any DD
> > > to *not* sponsor any package from Olivier Berger in the future, as he
> > > really had a bad attitude on this case.
> > 
> > I now believe I shouldn't have write the above, even with strong
> > disagreement on the technical issue (which I btw don't withdraw, but
> > that's not the point).
> 
> I hadn't noticed the original email you had sent to
> debian-release@d.o... 
> 
> I think it's not time to argue now that a minimal politeness would have
> been to CC: me when I was mentioned on such a public list, and in such a
> bad tone, given that you now apologize (and reading now that the
> responders did respond publicly in an appropriate way, IMHO).
> 
> I'll try forget about this episode.
> 
> > 
> > I should fix the issue and do an NMU, that's it, then I'm sure it would
> > have been ok. If someone sees this later, please do not take it into
> > account. I sent my apologies (privately) to Olivier for this (and the
> > rest), but I wanted to as well do it publicly.
> > 
> > Thomas
> 
> Thanks for your apologies.
> 
> I hope you'll be able to contribute to Debian in a more relaxed way in
> the future.
> 
> End of the episode, and back to work ;-)

-- 
Olivier BERGER <olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu>
http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France)


Reply to: