Re: libmikmod/stable on hppa version problem
On 07/15/2010 11:57 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:52:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>>>> We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most
>>>> recent DSA. That was released with the version number 3.1.11-a-6+lenny1,
>>>> following the usual scheme. However, as it seems hppa had a version that used
>>>> the old binNMU numbering scheme: 3.1.11-a-6.0.1, which is considered newer:
>>>> http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libmikmod2
>>>
>>> [also visible on http://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable.html
>>> fwiw]
>>>
>>>> Is there a way that we can solve this for hppa, or is the only way out a new
>>>> DSA update for all 12 archs with only change a new version number?
>>>
>>> I've been trying to think of an answer that doesn't necessitate a
>>> complete rebuild, but haven't come up with one thus far.
>>>
>>> Any solution that involves a sourceful upload will need to be rebuilt on
>>> all architectures. I'm not sure if the security archive / buildd setup
>>> makes it possible to only attempt to build a package on a restricted set
>>> of architectures; even if it does, as soon as the package is accepted in
>>> to proposed-updates the remaining architectures will then be auto-built
>>> for stable.
>>
>> I guess that only a manual build of a binNMU old scheme on hppa will
>> save you from having a sourceful upload and rebuilds on all
>> architectures. Probably the hppa buildd admins (in Cc) can help here?
>
> I can certainly do a build/upload if someone points me to the binNMU
> old scheme process :)
AFAIK, it's a matter of updating the changelog with an entry with the
appropriate version (3.1.11-a-6+lenny1.0.1) and building the binary package.
Cheers
Luk
Reply to: